Replying to LO25277 --
thanks for that well put from an effective point of view.
I get the feeling some times when a certain point of view is challenged,
and I admit some times I can take rather a radical one, some participants
take it personally.
Many of us seem totally unable to realise that even a spiritual view of
the world is only a view, however if one remains attached to it, it
becomes personal because one has put some investment in it and because of
this we value it. The best models ever devised by man can overnight be
And all models of the world are only thinking about the universe not the
Leslie Lax wrote:
> My formal logic training is limited - so perhaps I am missing something in
> the language of logic in this note.
> It seems to me that the issue here is one of what one chooses from a
> temporally finite choice. Finite in time because at any "point" in time
> we are aware of a finite (though hopefully extensive) choice of truths.
> The range of choices may include "none of the above" and "all of the
> above" which would indeed mean that one is free not to choose. One still
> has liberty in the act of deciding which truth(s) to accept.
Gavin Ritz <email@example.com>
Learning-org -- Hosted by Rick Karash <Richard@Karash.com> Public Dialog on Learning Organizations -- <http://www.learning-org.com>
"Learning-org" and the format of our message identifiers (LO1234, etc.) are trademarks of Richard Karash.