Replying to LO28316 --
Dear Organlearners,
Ray Harrell <mcore@nyc.rr.com> writes:
>Osiyo At, (Cherokee hello)
Osiyo dear Ray,
Am I glad to use that word! Please tell me what is Cherokee word for
"dear".
>In art you grow complexity and manage change
>to the delight in novelty while in science you grow
>simplicity and eliminate change in the ritual of
>repetition as truth. It you can't repeat it then it isn't
>true (science).
Then I am not a scientist any more, neither an artist ;-)
I have learned self that as a scientist, making first that novel
experiment (practice) or that mental construction (theory) is the art of
science. Checking on this art by repeating it is the drudgery of science.
They who excell in doing it may be called craftsman according to your:
>If you are obvious and predictable in you repetition
>then you are no artist. A craftsman maybe but not
>an artist.
Thank you Ray for settting me thinking again exactly where Art comes into
science. Now where would Science come exactly into art? And where do they
leave each other???
With care and best wishes,
--At de Lange <amdelange@gold.up.ac.za> Snailmail: A M de Lange Gold Fields Computer Centre Faculty of Science - University of Pretoria Pretoria 0001 - Rep of South Africa
Learning-org -- Hosted by Rick Karash <Richard@Karash.com> Public Dialog on Learning Organizations -- <http://www.learning-org.com>
"Learning-org" and the format of our message identifiers (LO1234, etc.) are trademarks of Richard Karash.