Replying to LO24147 --
Richard Seel wrote:
> Marketing need not be manipulative at its heart. One view is that the role
> of marketing is to try to find out what people want or need and then to
> deliver this to them.
> In this idealised sense marketing is a servant discipline, one which seeks
> to change the "We know what's best for you" approach of so many
> enterprises to a "please tell us what is best for you" approach.
> I was briefly in marketing and, yes - if you prick us, do we not bleed?
> (Of course, I am also aware of the other end of this spectrum but there is
> light here as well as darkness.)
Very good point, in my opinion.
The difference between traditional, coercive marketing communications and
our collaborative model is the difference between learning what a customer
"wants to hear," and learning what a customer truly needs, prefers or
It is this "idealized" approach, in your words, that we are implementing
THE FIELDSTONE HILL GROUP
Collaborative Sales & Marketing
Consulting, Training and Tools
David Kramer <email@example.com>
Learning-org -- Hosted by Rick Karash <firstname.lastname@example.org> Public Dialog on Learning Organizations -- <http://www.learning-org.com>
"Learning-org" and the format of our message identifiers (LO1234, etc.) are trademarks of Richard Karash.