Systemic basis for a 'natural morality'? LO29856

From: Fred Nickols (nickols@safe-t.net)
Date: 01/27/03

Next message: ACampnona@aol.com: "Mary Parker Follett (1) LO29861"
Previous message: Alan Cotterell: "Mary Parker Follett (1) LO29859"
In reply to: ACampnona@aol.com: "Systemic basis for a 'natural morality'? LO29846"
Next in thread: AM de Lange: "Systemic basis for a 'natural morality'? LO29844"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Replying to Andrew in LO29846 --

Andrew wrote:

>Fred asks of 'learning', "- how are we to judge its goodness?"
>
>Can you drill down a bit on what you mean by 'goodness', Fred?

Hmm. Good question. I'm not sure what if anything I meant by it beyond
"acceptable to the judge."

Regards,

Fred Nickols
nickols@safe-t.net

-- 
Fred Nickols <nickols@safe-t.net>
        Learning-org -- Hosted by Rick Karash <Richard@Karash.com>
  Public Dialog on Learning Organizations -- <http://www.learning-org.com>

Next message: ACampnona@aol.com: "Mary Parker Follett (1) LO29861"
Previous message: Alan Cotterell: "Mary Parker Follett (1) LO29859"
In reply to: ACampnona@aol.com: "Systemic basis for a 'natural morality'? LO29846"
Next in thread: AM de Lange: "Systemic basis for a 'natural morality'? LO29844"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

"Learning-org" and the format of our message identifiers (LO1234, etc.) are trademarks of Richard Karash.