Replying to LO30240 --
While most failures are either bottom/up or top/down less and less do I
find organizations set up in that way. While some organizational
hierarchy structures only shows itself in times of stress. Most
organizations I have seen are more a series of networks bumping into each
other, with little or no formal structure. I too have seen that most
successful organization change begin with and is controlled by middle tier
managers or networks of people working together.
Director Community Activities and Learning
P - 651.225.3895
F - 651.225.7695
The Northwest Area Foundation exists to help communities in our
eight-state region reduce poverty.
>Keith, I've heard this assertion repeatedly over the years, but remain
>to be convinced. It seems to me that the declaration that the "person
>in charge" is the single key factor in sustaining "good" behavior, which
>must also be "rewarded" only works, if at all, in circumstances where
>the organization is by definition a structure hierarchy where power
>flows down from above. Yet the LO literature abounds in cases where
>change is initiated and sustained in other ways, in organizations which
>are not structured as you seem to assume is always the case.
"Ellery July" <ejuly@NWAF.org>
Learning-org -- Hosted by Rick Karash <Richard@Karash.com> Public Dialog on Learning Organizations -- <http://www.learning-org.com>
"Learning-org" and the format of our message identifiers (LO1234, etc.) are trademarks of Richard Karash.