Two years after 9/11 LO30687

From: AM de Lange (
Date: 10/10/03

Replying to LO30676 --

Dear Organlearners,

Bill Harris <> wrote:

>I don't think that's true. This group became an LO at a time when
>they were universally acknowledged (perhaps not correctly, but
>that's a different story) as _the_ bottleneck in the organization. It
>was out of that trough that they became an LO.

Greetings dear Bill,

How glad was i to read the above.

I myself was involved in two "tacit LOs", is till a member of a "tacit LO"
and have investigated to other "tacit LOs" ("Tacit LO" means that the
organisation functions as a LO, even including the metanoia, but it is not
aware of Senge's articulation of a LO.) It is most interesting that all
five emerged as a LO after some troubling times! But i also have to had
that each first had a preparation period i which many memebers
deliberately tried to care for others.

With care and best wishes


At de Lange <> Snailmail: A M de Lange Gold Fields Computer Centre Faculty of Science - University of Pretoria Pretoria 0001 - Rep of South Africa

Learning-org -- Hosted by Rick Karash <> Public Dialog on Learning Organizations -- <>

"Learning-org" and the format of our message identifiers (LO1234, etc.) are trademarks of Richard Karash.