Replying to LO30676 --
Dear Organlearners,
Bill Harris <bill_harris@facilitatedsystems.com> wrote:
>I don't think that's true. This group became an LO at a time when
>they were universally acknowledged (perhaps not correctly, but
>that's a different story) as _the_ bottleneck in the organization. It
>was out of that trough that they became an LO.
Greetings dear Bill,
How glad was i to read the above.
I myself was involved in two "tacit LOs", is till a member of a "tacit LO"
and have investigated to other "tacit LOs" ("Tacit LO" means that the
organisation functions as a LO, even including the metanoia, but it is not
aware of Senge's articulation of a LO.) It is most interesting that all
five emerged as a LO after some troubling times! But i also have to had
that each first had a preparation period i which many memebers
deliberately tried to care for others.
With care and best wishes
--At de Lange <amdelange@postino.up.ac.za> Snailmail: A M de Lange Gold Fields Computer Centre Faculty of Science - University of Pretoria Pretoria 0001 - Rep of South Africa
Learning-org -- Hosted by Rick Karash <Richard@Karash.com> Public Dialog on Learning Organizations -- <http://www.learning-org.com>
"Learning-org" and the format of our message identifiers (LO1234, etc.) are trademarks of Richard Karash.