Replying to LO28425 --
I've changed the subject-line: it was Hard work etc.
Dear Judy,
Thank you for seeing an i in me. I've dropped writing I because i do not
see myself as I. Writing I seems to me to impy that I is more important
then you, he, she, it, we, you and they. And indeed didn't note that i is
also the square root of -1, the door to the complex numbers. However, it
only reinforces with me the idea that me, myself and i (re)redefine
ourselves - in a complex way with projections, retrojection,
introjections, subjections - as reflections of ourselves in others. These
processes result in an ambiguous picture - not in the least because we all
want to gain from the processes and ask each other: "can i have an i for
an i" - just as if i are a complex numbers.
Thank you for the support,
Jan
Judy Tal wrote:
> The only thing that confuses me, is that after writing what I cited above,
> you open the next paragraph with the word 'We'. see ...
--With kind regards - met vriendelijke groeten,
Jan Lelie
LOGISENS - Sparring Partner in Logistical Development mind@work est. 1998 - Group Resolution Process Support Tel.: (+31) (0)70 3243475 or GSM (car): (+31)(0)65 4685114 http://www.mindatwork.nl info@mindatwork.nl
Learning-org -- Hosted by Rick Karash <Richard@Karash.com> Public Dialog on Learning Organizations -- <http://www.learning-org.com>
"Learning-org" and the format of our message identifiers (LO1234, etc.) are trademarks of Richard Karash.